(Image Courtesy: The Hindu)
Over the past few weeks, there have been a large number of high-profile reports about airline biggies facing turbulent economic times and incurring high losses as part of their day-to-day operations. The situation has become kind of a hard brownie lodged in the government's throat. Aviation is an integral part of the country's economy as it not only helps the corporates, small and medium enterprises with a quick transport option but also encourages international and domestic forms of tourism. So, it is imperative for all of us to come up with a solution that allows the aviation sector to sustain profitably for many generations to come.
Let me present a freakonomics-style picture of the aviation sector by showing how much money an airline makes by running a typical domestic flight.
Cost of an average-sized aircraft: 85 million dollars (Airbus A320 or Boeing 737)
Assume that occupancy of the aircraft is 120 passengers
Average running cost of trip (per mile): $15, including ground costs and airborne costs
Cost of energy consumed by an aircraft (per mile) is equal to: $7.87
Fare charged to the consumer per mile (per mile) is equal to: $0.13
Total fare charged to the consumers : $0.13 * 120 = $15.6 per mile = $16942 for a 1075 mile, three-hour flight running non-stop from New Delhi to Bangalore.
Total amount of oil consumed during this journey would be equal to $8460 ... at $3.2 per gal, this is equal to 2323 gal of fuel consumed.
Total cost of the trip would be equal to $16125.
This shows that airlines operate on very thin margins, and thus rely on scales to minimise and optmize operating costs, wherever possible.
One of the most important factors involved in obtaining a good margin is the cost of fuel, which is more than half of the cost of operation.
Even if you assume that the total number of trips made per annum by an average-sized aircraft is 1000, it still earns around $17 million dollars, which is less than half the cost of the aircraft itself. If you assume 5% profit (optimistic scenario) per flight run, the total profit achieved is equal to $0.85 million. The airline will have to run the aircraft for 100 years to extract its total cost, an almost impossibility considering technology advances and becomes obsolete so rapidly in today's scenario.
Thus, on a very slim margin, you cannot expect airlines to achieve break-even in a short span of time. Airlines are only delaying their doomsday if they continue to rely on oil to sustain their business.
The solution?
Use a cheaper, alternative fuel that costs much lesser than the currently used jet fuel.
Short-term options - Use bio-fuels
Long-term options - Use fuel cells, or large arrays of batteries to power the aircraft (this technology is yet to be launched). The price of the aircraft will increase by 30% due to battery costs. However, the cost of fuel will be slashed to 50%
(per mile you need 2.45 gal of oil, of which only ~25% gets utilised, i.e. ~0.9 gal, which is equivalent to 39.5 units; at a cost of $0.10 per unit you can purchase energy to run the aircraft for the entire trip for $4230, saving $4230 per trip, increasing profit per trip to 32%).
If you run such a system for 1000 trips per annum, you earn a total of $5.1 million. Even if the aircraft costs $110.5 (i.e 30% more), you achieve break-even in 20-22 years. The batteries will form a replaceable component of the aircraft, are fully recyclable and have a lifecycle of 30 years.
The increased weight of the aircraft due to storage of battery arrays on board is an issue of debate, but with futuristic and state-of-the-art energy densities being attained, the weight of the aircraft would increase by about 12 metric tonnes (70 tonnes is the maximum kerb weight of an Airbus A320 aircraft).
New-age energy distribution companies e.g. better place are working on battery replacement stations which can coordinate with airport authorities to come up with supplementary services. They can share half of the battery costs with the airline companies.
This will also generate the need for massive level-3 charging stations and power supply stations.
To supply energy to 200 such trips per day, we need 8.5 million units of energy per day. This can be supplied by a 360 MW thermal/nuclear power plant, or a 900 MW power plant. The cost of set up of such a solar power plant would be around $2.3 billion. For a power plant that has already broken even, the above is not a problem. However, solely by selling energy at $0.10 per unit, the plant breaks even in 10 years.
Now assume the airlines have a captive power plant, then all the energy generated is used by them only. In this scenario:
- Cost of fuel is 0
- Profit margin per trip is equal to 60%
- Amount earned per annum is equal to $10.2 million
- You earn the cost of your aircraft in 10-11 years
- Cost of set up of power plant is extracted in the next 2 years
In this approach, aviation sector would remain a long-term game but will be profitably sustainable in the long run.
To come up with this class of aircrafts, we need a team effort by entrepreneurs from different domains, namely - energy storage technology, energy distribution, battery charging and replacement, solar power generation, aircraft manufacturing and of course, the government.
The above might look unfeasible today, but think of it this way: a remote-controlled toy aircraft can be powered by batteries. Why not have a full-blown version of it ? Also, necessity is the mother of invention, so we must devise a smart and sustainable solution to fly across the planet before it's too late !
Disclaimer: The above facts are based on empirical studies and might not be accurate to the letter. An approximate picture tending towards the future has been presented in this article.